🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions regarding the comments delivered by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Instead, he invoked the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: none of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and concussive power on both forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is frequently overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty severe restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a several significant, improbable improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply too much and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend far too much effort to win it. Facing set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not just say how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {